Feedback

• Most of the shoots were held tight steady but some were obviously hand held, this looked amateur.
• The shots were odly framed and some were not very continous and this was quite obvious which didnt help.
• Most of the shots were the same with a couple of close ups this was a shame as a wider variety of shots would have helped the overall feel of the intro
• Was obviously an opening sequence yet the intro credits were far to long and got tedious quickly.
• The material was very related to task and this was one of the best parts of the intro; its suitibility.
• The editing was acceptable yet the flow of the shoots felt quite jerky at times.
• The transitions were all the same and the apearing of the apple could have been massively improved by using a tripod.

Group 64- there credits went on for ages. The music was good at the start but then after it didn't make any sense and it sounded like 2 or 3 pieces playing at the same time. It could have been a lot more simple. The film behind the credits was unclear and the green from the green screen could still be seen. We think we could hear someone laughing when the apple appears midshot. when the film comes in after the credits the girl appears twice in two places. The mise-en-scene was good with the use of props, however, it was like an advert. it was not very smooth.

Group 63:

Credits go on for ages which could bore the viewer after a while. Story line isnt really that clear until the very end. Liked the special effects at the start when you see the pen in the sky! Music fits well with the story line which is good. Thought the title was good as it looks like something kids would enjoy looking at. all in all thought it was good :).